Palyginimas: Kumho Ecsta HS52 prieš. Kleber Quadraxer 3 prieš. Continental PremiumContact 7

Aukštesniojo ir vidutinio lygio

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

VS

Aukštesniojo ir vidutinio lygio

Kleber

Quadraxer 3

PremiumContact 7

9.7

R16 – R21

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

Ecsta HS52

Quadraxer 3

PremiumContact 7

Testų skaičius

10

13

28

Best position

#2

#4

#1

Average position

6.0

6.3

2.3

Naujausias bandymas

2026

2025

2026

Galimi dydžiai

109

116

67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

šlapia

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Akvaplanavimas - išilginis

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

Stabdymas ant šlapios dangos

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Aquaplaning - kryžius

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

Važiavimas šlapiu ratu posūkiuose

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Drėgnas tvarkymas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Komfortas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

Išorinis triukšmas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Komfortas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

Sausas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Sausas stabdymas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

Sausas tvarkymas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Išlaidos

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

Pasipriešinimas riedėjimui

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Rida

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Kaina ir vertė

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kleber Quadraxer 3

Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Matmenys ir kainos

Palyginkite kainas visuose galimuose šių padangų matmenyse.

Naršyti reitingus

Best tyres for evs Geriausios sausai važiuojančios padangos Geriausios lietaus padangos Geriausiai valdomos padangos Tyliausios padangos Ekonomiškiausios padangos Geriausios nuo akvaplanavimo apsaugančios padangos

Populiarūs padangų palyginimai

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Taip pat palyginkite

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Avon ZV7

Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Naršyti pagal prekės ženklą

Palyginimas: Kumho Ecsta HS52 prieš. Kleber Quadraxer 3 prieš. Continental PremiumContact 7

Ecsta HS52

Quadraxer 3

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Tread pattern comparison

Matmenys ir kainos

Naršyti reitingus

Populiarūs padangų palyginimai

Taip pat palyginkite

Naršyti pagal prekės ženklą

Pridėti prie palyginimo