Palyginimas: Nokian WetProof prieš. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 prieš. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 prieš. Continental PremiumContact 6

Aukštesniojo ir vidutinio lygio

Nokian

WetProof

VS

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Cinturato P7

Ventus S1 evo3 K127

Test profile

WetProof

Ventus Prime3 K125

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

Testų skaičius

14

22

18

36

Best position

#1

Average position

5.6

4.9

6.1

3.1

Naujausias bandymas

2023

2022

2024

2023

Galimi dydžiai

47

161

47

296

Našumo palyginimas

Vidurkis iš 2 testų

Drėgnas sukibimas

76%

Nokian

WetProof

76%

Hankook

Ventus Prime3 K125

64%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Stabdymas ant šlapios dangos

Nokian WetProof

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

95%

Drėgnas tvarkymas

Nokian WetProof

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

59%

Continental PremiumContact 6

88%

Važiavimas šlapiu ratu posūkiuose

Nokian WetProof

89%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

89%

Continental PremiumContact 6

82%

Ilgintuvinis akvaplanavimas

Nokian WetProof

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

57%

Continental PremiumContact 6

67%

Skersinis akvaplanavimas

Nokian WetProof

70%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 6

50%

Sausas našumas

80%

Nokian

WetProof

93%

Hankook

Ventus Prime3 K125

67%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Sausas stabdymas

Nokian WetProof

84%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

94%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

Sausas tvarkymas

Nokian WetProof

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 6

75%

Komfortas ir triukšmas

75%

Nokian

WetProof

73%

Hankook

Ventus Prime3 K125

81%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Išorinis triukšmas

Nokian WetProof

80%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

70%

Vidinis triukšmas

Nokian WetProof

81%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

74%

Continental PremiumContact 6

74%

Važiavimo komfortas

Nokian WetProof

64%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Continental PremiumContact 6

64%

Ekonomija

65%

Nokian

WetProof

71%

Hankook

Ventus Prime3 K125

94%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Pasipriešinimas riedėjimui

Nokian WetProof

71%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 6

55%

Degalų naudojimo efektyvumas

Nokian WetProof

78%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

87%

Continental PremiumContact 6

73%

Rida

Nokian WetProof

45%

Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Continental PremiumContact 6

73%

Testai, naudoti palyginimui

Organizacija	Sezonas	Metai	Matmuo
Autobild	Vasara	2021	205/55 R16	Peržiūrėti
ADAC	Vasara	2021	205/55 R16	Peržiūrėti

Matmenys ir kainos

Palyginkite kainas visuose galimuose šių padangų matmenyse.

View general comparison

Palyginimas: Nokian WetProof prieš. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 prieš. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 prieš. Continental PremiumContact 6

WetProof

Ventus Prime3 K125

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

Test profile

Našumo palyginimas

Testai, naudoti palyginimui

Matmenys ir kainos

Pridėti prie palyginimo