Palyginimas: Nokian WetProof prieš. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 prieš. Firestone Roadhawk prieš. BFGoodrich Advantage prieš. Continental PremiumContact 6

Aukštesniojo ir vidutinio lygio

Nokian

WetProof

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Advantage

PremiumContact 6

Testų skaičius

14

18

21

14

36

Best position

#1

#2

#8

#1

Average position

5.6

6.1

11.9

13.4

3.1

Naujausias bandymas

2023

2024

2026

2023

Galimi dydžiai

47

164

153

296

Našumo palyginimas

Drėgnas sukibimas

70%

Nokian

WetProof

64%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Firestone

Roadhawk

62%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

70%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Stabdymas ant šlapios dangos

Nokian WetProof

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

96%

Drėgnas tvarkymas

Nokian WetProof

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

59%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

51%

Continental PremiumContact 6

75%

Ilgintuvinis akvaplanavimas

Nokian WetProof

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

57%

Firestone Roadhawk

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Continental PremiumContact 6

57%

Skersinis akvaplanavimas

Nokian WetProof

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

60%

Continental PremiumContact 6

51%

Sausas našumas

76%

Nokian

WetProof

67%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Firestone

Roadhawk

79%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

71%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Sausas stabdymas

Nokian WetProof

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Continental PremiumContact 6

66%

Sausas tvarkymas

Nokian WetProof

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

92%

Continental PremiumContact 6

75%

Komfortas ir triukšmas

73%

Nokian

WetProof

81%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

63%

Firestone

Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

68%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Išorinis triukšmas

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

71%

Važiavimo komfortas

Nokian WetProof

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

73%

Continental PremiumContact 6

64%

Ekonomija

55%

Nokian

WetProof

94%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

55%

Firestone

Roadhawk

66%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

70%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Pasipriešinimas riedėjimui

Nokian WetProof

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

88%

Firestone Roadhawk

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

55%

Rida

Nokian WetProof

38%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental PremiumContact 6

84%

Testai, naudoti palyginimui

Organizacija	Sezonas	Metai	Matmuo
Autobild	Vasara	2021	205/55 R16	Peržiūrėti

Matmenys ir kainos

Palyginkite kainas visuose galimuose šių padangų matmenyse.

View general comparison

Palyginimas: Nokian WetProof prieš. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 prieš. Firestone Roadhawk prieš. BFGoodrich Advantage prieš. Continental PremiumContact 6

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Advantage

PremiumContact 6

Test profile

Našumo palyginimas

Testai, naudoti palyginimui

Matmenys ir kainos

Pridėti prie palyginimo