2 Shops · 2,093+ Products

Palyginimas: Michelin Energy Saver + prieš. Kumho Ecsta HS52 prieš. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Testų skaičius
4
10
6
Best position
#5
#2
#3
Average position
10.3
6.0
4.7
Naujausias bandymas
2018
2026
2026
Galimi dydžiai
104
146

šlapia

šlapia
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - kryžius
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Akvaplanavimas - išilginis
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Važiavimas šlapiu ratu posūkiuose
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Drėgnas tvarkymas
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Išlaidos

Išlaidos
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Pasipriešinimas riedėjimui
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Rida
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Sausas

Sausas
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Sausas tvarkymas
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Komfortas

Komfortas
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Išorinis triukšmas
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Matmenys ir kainos

Palyginkite kainas visuose galimuose šių padangų matmenyse.

Pridėti prie palyginimo

Popular brands
Naujas palyginimas