Palyginimas: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 prieš. Kumho Ecsta HS52 prieš. BFGoodrich Advantage prieš. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aukštesniojo ir vidutinio lygio

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

7.2

R14 – R17

VS

Aukštesniojo ir vidutinio lygio

Kumho

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

Dynaxer HP4

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testų skaičius

11

10

14

3

Best position

#1

#2

#8

#2

Average position

11.6

6.0

13.4

3.3

Naujausias bandymas

2024

2026

Galimi dydžiai

121

104

153

40

šlapia

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - kryžius

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Akvaplanavimas - išilginis

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Stabdymas ant šlapios dangos

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Drėgnas tvarkymas

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Važiavimas šlapiu ratu posūkiuose

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Drėgnas sukibimas

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Sausas

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Sausas stabdymas

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Sausas tvarkymas

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Sausas našumas

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Komfortas

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Išorinis triukšmas

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Komfortas

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Vidaus triukšmas

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Išlaidos

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rida

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Pasipriešinimas riedėjimui

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kaina ir vertė

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Matmenys ir kainos

Palyginkite kainas visuose galimuose šių padangų matmenyse.

Palyginimas: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 prieš. Kumho Ecsta HS52 prieš. BFGoodrich Advantage prieš. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

šlapia

Sausas

Komfortas

Išlaidos

Matmenys ir kainos

Pridėti prie palyginimo