2 Shops · 2,093+ Products

Palyginimas: Continental UltraContact prieš. Kumho Ecsta HS52 prieš. Falken e.Ziex prieš. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Continental
UltraContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Testų skaičius
10
3
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
3.7
3.3
Naujausias bandymas
2026
2025
2026
Galimi dydžiai
104
34
40

šlapia

šlapia
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Stabdymas ant šlapios dangos
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kryžius
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Akvaplanavimas - išilginis
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Komfortas

Komfortas
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Išorinis triukšmas
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Sausas

Sausas
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Sausas stabdymas
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Išlaidos

Išlaidos
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rida
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Matmenys ir kainos

Palyginkite kainas visuose galimuose šių padangų matmenyse.

Pridėti prie palyginimo

Popular brands
Naujas palyginimas