Palyginimas: BFGoodrich Advantage prieš. Kumho Ecsta HS52 prieš. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 prieš. Hankook Ventus Evo

Aukštesniojo ir vidutinio lygio

BFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8

R14 – R20

VS

Aukštesniojo ir vidutinio lygio

Kumho

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Testų skaičius

14

10

3

Best position

#8

#2

Average position

13.4

6.0

3.3

Naujausias bandymas

2026

Galimi dydžiai

153

104

40

60

šlapia

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Drėgnas tvarkymas

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - kryžius

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Stabdymas ant šlapios dangos

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Akvaplanavimas - išilginis

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Važiavimas šlapiu ratu posūkiuose

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Drėgnas sukibimas

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Sausas

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Sausas stabdymas

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Sausas tvarkymas

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Sausas našumas

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Komfortas

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Išorinis triukšmas

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Komfortas

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Išlaidos

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Pasipriešinimas riedėjimui

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Rida

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Matmenys ir kainos

Palyginkite kainas visuose galimuose šių padangų matmenyse.

Palyginimas: BFGoodrich Advantage prieš. Kumho Ecsta HS52 prieš. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 prieš. Hankook Ventus Evo

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Test profile

šlapia

Sausas

Komfortas

Išlaidos

Matmenys ir kainos

Pridėti prie palyginimo